Type 99 Arisaka Serial Numbers
While the Type 99 was mostly just a Type 38 chambered in 7.7x58mm there were some changes. The ejector now passed through the left bolt lug entirely. The magazine floor plate was hinged to prevent its loss in the field.
Auction:14899812 LSB#: 180419GC03 Make: Kokura Arsenal, Japan Model: Type 99 Arisaka Serial Number: 37408 Year of Manufacture: 1939 to 1943. Type 99 arisaka serial numbers, type 99 rifle serial numbers. Click on a term to search for related topics. Thread Tools: Show Printable Version. Email this Page.
This one will add to your WWII or Military collection. CA Legal or CA Private Party Transferable: This rifle is curio and relic eligible and can be transferred/sold in California.
Both rifles use the same blade adjustable in the same manner. The original pattern front sight guards were dropped mid-war as the protection they offered was dubious to begin with and took valuable machining time to produce. Today you often see them mis-shapen on issued rifles, giving testament to their fragility. You will also note the early rifle has a finely form-stamped and machined set of barrel bands while the later rifle's bands are made of bent and welded flat stock. The latter was much cheaper to manufacture and worked just as well. Perhaps no image will better illustrate the sacrifice of form over function as Japan's war fortunes worsened than the following photo.
All his images and videos in this article were used with permission. Is available at this link here. Also, contains some period information on the rifle. Anyone wishing to read the markings on their Type 99 should consult. Great video and accurate information.
The Type 30 bayonet was carried over yet again, this time mounted to a forward band with reinforcing tangs to improve strength. The resulting rifle was an improvement over Nambu’s Type 38, shortened and incorporating several novel features. These included a sliding, integrated dust cover, a folding monopod, and flip out anti-aircraft sights. Unfortunately, these three features have garnered a substantial amount of mockery and derision, but there is more to them than immediately meets the eye. To understand the first of these, we must turn to the five points Kijiro Nambu adhered to when developing the Type 38, the Type 99’s predecessor which also incorporated a dust cover: • The rifle must be easy to assemble and disassemble. • The entire bolt assembly had to be simplified vs. The Mauser by reducing the number of parts • The rifle had to be strong and continue to function in adverse conditions • The rifle should attain 100% reliability and freed from all mechanical failures • The rifle must have a dignified appearance, which will ensure that the users will not handle it carelessly or abuse it.
Initially, rifles make in Japanese arsenals were numbered consecutively within each Type designation. In 1933 this scheme was replaced by a system in which rifles were numbered in blocks, or series, of 99,999 each [actually 100,000, according to Honeycutt, running from serial numbers 0 through 99,999].
Limited numbers were also captured during World War II and used by Filipino and American guerrillas. •: few were actually issued. Manufactured at the Incheon armory during Japanese occupation, some were converted to fire US ammunition and used during the Korean war.
Please visit Bryan's site at.) ARISAKA VARIANTS Type 30 Rifle and Carbine: These are easily identified by the hook shaped safety on the back of the bolt. This and all models until the Type 99 have a bore diameter of 6.5mm. Arisaka Type 30 Image Credit: Honeycutt, Fred L. Patt Anthoyn, Military Rifles of Japan, Julin Books, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 1996, Page 31 Type 35 Rifle: These are rather scarce and can be identified by its small round safety. Late in WWII, Japan created 'substitute standard' rifles using Type 35 barreled actions and 'last ditch' parts made from inferior materials. These are referred to by collectors as the Model 02/45 rifle. Arisaka Type 35 Image Credit: Honeycutt, Fred L.
The original pattern front sight guards were dropped mid-war as the protection they offered was dubious to begin with and took valuable machining time to produce. Today you often see them mis-shapen on issued rifles, giving testament to their fragility. You will also note the early rifle has a finely form-stamped and machined set of barrel bands while the later rifle's bands are made of bent and welded flat stock. The latter was much cheaper to manufacture and worked just as well. Perhaps no image will better illustrate the sacrifice of form over function as Japan's war fortunes worsened than the following photo. From the bolt root to the bolt face, both bolts are identical, though the later war bolt has less post-machining polishing on the body and the chrome lining is omitted from the bolt face. Here the similarities end.
I found a repro rod on ebay for a decent price. 25/box is good (Norma was almost 40/box when I first got my 99), and it'll give you a supply of brass to start. I'm reloading with 174gr blems (Midway) over 45gr varget for about 49c/rd Aj98, Thank you!
I am going to put some penetrating oil on it and see if that helps. The nose cap and outside of the barrel is covered in very light rust and darkened patina. I was afraid the bore was the same.
In recent months I have heard a GREAT MANY oft-repeated but factually wrong myths perpetuated about the Type 99 rifle and the supposedly dangerously unsafe 'last ditch' Type 99. Let me start this little edjumacation by stating it clearly: There is no such thing as a 'last ditch type 99'. This misnomer was begun when American servicemen, many of whom could not read or speak Japanese, did some stupid things when occupying post-war Japan.
Both bolts are indiscernibly similar in smoothness and function. If anything the late-war bolt is a little easier to operate as it is not slowed by dust cover friction and the handles are a little longer owing to the extra length needed to facilitate handle welding. Finally, nothing screamed cheap to US servicemen like a wooden buttplate crudely nailed to the stock. This is a clear attempt by the Japanese to conserve steel after the US NAVY had ruthlessly culled the Japanese merchant fleet.
(The bolt is in good condition, it obviously has to do with the other components.) My plan is to A) Shoot my Mosin and Lee-Enfield more, and B) Try cleaning the Arisaka out some more and see if that helps.
The Japanese, then and now, use both number systems, and there seems no real rhyme or reason as to which is used where. I know of no use of the Japanese numbering for serial numbers of weapons, but the model 'Type' numbers are always Japanese. I have never been in Japan, but have been told that it is (or at least was) common for stores to display prices in both 'arabic' numbers and Japanese. The latter was a lower price and that is what you paid if you could read the Japanese numbers; if you couldn't, you paid the higher price. I laughed MAO at that story; really neat. • The Firearms Forum is on online community for all gun enthusiasts.
Clipper valkyrie 5 download. It was determined that the latter would be too costly to repair, and so the arsenal was moved to Kokura, more than 500 miles away. Free usenet account generator. This essentially halted development of the project, and, with the exception of some testing in 1929, major progress would not again begin on a 7.7mm bore infantry rifle until 1938.
Arisaka Type 99 Rifle Serial Numbers
Patt Anthoyn, Military Rifles of Japan, Julin Books, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 1996, Page 37 Type 38 Rifle and Carbine: These can be distinguished by both its very long and short lengths, elaborately machined safety knobs, and two gas vent holes over the chamber. Carbines have very short rear sights as opposed to the long ladder sights of the rifle. The Japanese rebarreled some rifles to an intermediate length, and designated them as 'Cavalry rifles'.
Japanese Arisaka Type 99 Rifle Serial Numbers
The view on the AA sight was based on my personal opinion, not any trial or fact and it's great that it's sparked some discussion The monopod was an interesting feature as well, though in reality I believe the reason it was dropped had more to do with the height and exposure of the soldier if it were deployed - it really puts you up there and lowers cover. Since WW2, infantrymen generally want to be as low to the ground as practical. The dust cover was a good idea, but used up valuable steel better allocated elsewhere in my view. The Germans invented a similar cover in WW1, then dropped it as being to expensive for the small gain. (we're talking economies over millions of rifles here).